{"id":1146,"date":"2020-03-28T17:03:42","date_gmt":"2020-03-28T21:03:42","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/sites.smith.edu\/sexualharassmentlaw\/?p=1146"},"modified":"2020-03-28T17:03:42","modified_gmt":"2020-03-28T21:03:42","slug":"minarsky-v-susquehanna-cty-895-f-3d-303-3d-cir-2018","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/sites.smith.edu\/sexualharassmentlaw\/chapters\/chapter-4\/minarsky-v-susquehanna-cty-895-f-3d-303-3d-cir-2018\/","title":{"rendered":"Minarsky v. Susquehanna Cty., 895 F.3d 303 (3d Cir. 2018)"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>At issue in this case are the two elements of the <em>Faragher-Ellerth<\/em> affirmative defense that Susquehanna County raised. The District Court granted summary judgment in favor of the County, holding that the elements of this defense had been proven as a matter of law. The Third Circuit of the United States Court of Appeals vacated the judgment of the District Court, holding that the elements of the <em>Faragher-Ellerth<\/em> affirmative defense should be decided by a jury. <\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/law.justia.com\/cases\/federal\/appellate-courts\/ca3\/17-2646\/17-2646-2018-07-03.html\">Opinion<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>At issue in this case are the two elements of the Faragher-Ellerth affirmative defense that Susquehanna County raised. The District Court granted summary judgment in favor of the County, holding that the elements of this defense had been proven as a matter of law. The Third Circuit of the United States Court of Appeals vacated &hellip; <\/p>\n<p class=\"link-more\"><a href=\"https:\/\/sites.smith.edu\/sexualharassmentlaw\/chapters\/chapter-4\/minarsky-v-susquehanna-cty-895-f-3d-303-3d-cir-2018\/\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading<span class=\"screen-reader-text\"> &#8220;Minarsky v. Susquehanna Cty., 895 F.3d 303 (3d Cir. 2018)&#8221;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3337,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[101,8],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1146","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-cases","category-chapter-4"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/sites.smith.edu\/sexualharassmentlaw\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1146","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/sites.smith.edu\/sexualharassmentlaw\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/sites.smith.edu\/sexualharassmentlaw\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sites.smith.edu\/sexualharassmentlaw\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3337"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sites.smith.edu\/sexualharassmentlaw\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1146"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/sites.smith.edu\/sexualharassmentlaw\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1146\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1147,"href":"https:\/\/sites.smith.edu\/sexualharassmentlaw\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1146\/revisions\/1147"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/sites.smith.edu\/sexualharassmentlaw\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1146"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sites.smith.edu\/sexualharassmentlaw\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1146"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sites.smith.edu\/sexualharassmentlaw\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1146"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}