{"id":170,"date":"1998-03-04T13:10:47","date_gmt":"1998-03-04T18:10:47","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/sites.smith.edu\/sexualharassmentlaw\/?p=170"},"modified":"2020-01-07T11:10:08","modified_gmt":"2020-01-07T16:10:08","slug":"oncale-v-sundowner-offshore-services-inc-523-u-s-75-1998","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/sites.smith.edu\/sexualharassmentlaw\/chapters\/chapter-3\/oncale-v-sundowner-offshore-services-inc-523-u-s-75-1998\/","title":{"rendered":"Oncale v. Sundowner Offshore Services, Inc., 523 U.S. 75 (1998)"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.oyez.org\/cases\/1997\/96-568\">Oncale v. Sundowner Offshore Services, Inc., 523 U.S. 75 (1998)<\/a> ruled that Title VII prohibits same-sex sexual harassment.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/supreme.justia.com\/cases\/federal\/us\/523\/75\/#tab-opinion-1960325\">Opinion<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>For oral argument: <a href=\"https:\/\/www.oyez.org\/cases\/1997\/96-568\">https:\/\/www.oyez.org\/cases\/1997\/96-568<\/a><\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone size-medium wp-image-625\" src=\"https:\/\/sites.smith.edu\/sexualharassmentlaw\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/396\/1998\/03\/oncale-300x251.jpeg\" alt=\"\" width=\"300\" height=\"251\" srcset=\"https:\/\/sites.smith.edu\/sexualharassmentlaw\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/396\/1998\/03\/oncale-300x251.jpeg 300w, https:\/\/sites.smith.edu\/sexualharassmentlaw\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/396\/1998\/03\/oncale.jpeg 325w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px\" \/><\/p>\n<p>Joseph Oncale and his attorneys.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Oncale v. Sundowner Offshore Services, Inc., 523 U.S. 75 (1998) ruled that Title VII prohibits same-sex sexual harassment. Opinion. For oral argument: https:\/\/www.oyez.org\/cases\/1997\/96-568 Joseph Oncale and his attorneys.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2932,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[137,101,7,19],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-170","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-supreme-court-cases","category-cases","category-chapter-3","category-employment"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/sites.smith.edu\/sexualharassmentlaw\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/170","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/sites.smith.edu\/sexualharassmentlaw\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/sites.smith.edu\/sexualharassmentlaw\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sites.smith.edu\/sexualharassmentlaw\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2932"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sites.smith.edu\/sexualharassmentlaw\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=170"}],"version-history":[{"count":5,"href":"https:\/\/sites.smith.edu\/sexualharassmentlaw\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/170\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":991,"href":"https:\/\/sites.smith.edu\/sexualharassmentlaw\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/170\/revisions\/991"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/sites.smith.edu\/sexualharassmentlaw\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=170"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sites.smith.edu\/sexualharassmentlaw\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=170"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sites.smith.edu\/sexualharassmentlaw\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=170"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}